selenite0: (anvil)
[personal profile] selenite0
. . . to have your project mentioned on the front page of the Wall Street Journal. (pay site)

PENTAGON JUGGLES weapons programs amid budget squeeze.

Senior Defense officials pored over options this week as Deputy Secretary England pushes to trim the huge Joint Strike Fighter jet program. Air Force officials are resisting.


Not that I can I claim it's what's most needed in the current war, but I'd hate to be hit by the layoff.

Date: 2005-11-25 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dekarch.livejournal.com
JSF. . . Just In Case a "Real War"[tm] should break out. . .

Although, as grunt I'm obligated to point out that the JSF project ALONE is spending more money per year than the entire R&D budget for the entire US Army.

Date: 2005-11-26 05:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com
No argument. It scares me when I see emails from the troops talking about the WWII era weapons being the most useful ones.

Date: 2005-11-26 07:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dekarch.livejournal.com
???

Other than the M-2 HB .50 caliber machine gun, there are no WWII era weapons in service.

Date: 2005-11-26 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phanatic.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you've gotta admit, it's really useful.

Date: 2005-11-27 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com
I was referring to this piece on a marine's opinion of his equipment. (http://nervous-rodent.blogspot.com/2005/11/marine-reports-from-iraq.html) He was talking up the M-2, the .45 pistol, and M-14 rifle (which, you're right, isn't from WWII--I plead Air Force).

Date: 2005-11-27 05:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phanatic.livejournal.com
This thing's been pretty thoroughly debunked all over the place. The M243 SAW? Huh?

Date: 2005-11-27 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dekarch.livejournal.com
As phanatic noted, the thing has been debunked thoroughly. Every single weapon mentioned has incorrect information somewhere.

6lb body armor? Try 26lb.

M243? No such thing, it's the M-249 and it is a wonderful weapon which I carried downrange for about six months. Love it to death.

M14 is not being issued in bulk, nor modified with kevlar stocks.

Shotguns--wrong model, and they are for breaching, not room clearing. Clearing rooms with shotguns leads to dead noncombatants.

Barretts are used for EOD, primarily.

M-240 is nothing more than an FN MAG. They are issued in several versions, from helicoptor door guns to coax and loader MGs on tanks, to standard GPMG bipod and shoulder stock configurations in infantry platoons.

Marines wouldn't have an experience with M-4s, they never adopted them.

M-16A4s do NOT have a jamming problem if you clean your damn weapons. I also didn't have any problem dropping insurgents. Or dogs, for that matter.

And no one is conducting "random autopsies" on insurgents.

Date: 2005-11-27 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phanatic.livejournal.com
Clearing rooms with shotguns leads to dead noncombatants.

Why? 00 buck out of improved cylinder choke gives you a spread of about 1" per yard of travel. So even at 18 feet, you're still at a 6" spread. I wouldn't expect that to kill anyone you're not deliberately aiming at, unless you're not deliberately aiming at all, in which case anything you fire could lead to dead noncombatants.

Date: 2005-11-27 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phanatic.livejournal.com
I dig how the M-243 is drum-fed, too. For some nonce of a reporter, I could see confusing the 200-round boxes with a drum, but someone familiar enough with the weapon to pass accurate judgement on it is sure as hell not going to do that.

Date: 2005-11-27 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dekarch.livejournal.com
Yeah, I missed a lot of bloopers in the article.

Besides, who uses boxes anymore? 100-rd cloth 'assault pouches' are the usual nowdays.

Date: 2005-11-27 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com
Okay, I'll refile that one to the bit bucket. Thanks for the info.

Date: 2005-11-26 12:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phanatic.livejournal.com
Reasons why I'm glad I work on CH-47s, #37 in a series.

Date: 2005-11-26 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ndrosen.livejournal.com
I don't claim any special wisdom on whether the JSF is the best use of our tax dollars, under the circumstances (and just what will the circumstances be in ten years?), but I don't want you to lose your job. Good luck!

Profile

selenite0: (Default)
selenite0

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 12th, 2026 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios