| A Black Rook You scored 3 Power-Finesse, 0 Leader-Follower, 2 Unique-Ordinary, and 2 Offense-Defense! |
You don't have to worry about fancy plans, or sophisticated schemes. You are just on the board to kick some ass and smash some white pieces. You stand by your leaders, and they get worried when you are removed from play. You work best with your buddy, the other black rook, and when you don't have him watching your six, you tend to be somewhat innefective. |
|
| Link: The What Chess Piece Are You Test written by Gundark27 on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the 32-Type Dating Test |
I'm amused by this one--as a chess player I tend to prefer working with the rooks in the middle and end game. They're more powerful than the queen. I'll often force a trade of queens--lots of players will give up a piece or two trying to avoid it.

Ah, but the Queen demands respect
Date: 2005-12-21 11:47 pm (UTC)You scored 3 Power-Finesse, 4 Leader-Follower, 3 Unique-Ordinary, and 1 Offense-Defense!
Re: Ah, but the Queen demands respect
Date: 2005-12-22 12:16 am (UTC)But after reading the last line I really want to see Bob's score. Don't let him see yours first.
And Bob is:
Date: 2005-12-22 12:49 am (UTC)You scored 2 Power-Finesse, 4 Leader-Follower, 4 Unique-Ordinary, and 1 Offense-Defense!
You are conniving and sneaky, and often overlooked by your opponent. You are content to stay off to one side, allowing the bloodbath to ensue. Then, when the moment is right and the other king has let his guard down you strike! Your indirect approach to things gives your team more options. However, in the big picture you are expendable. No matter how hard you try, you can only reach half the squares on the board.
My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
You scored higher than 99% on Power-Finesse
You scored higher than 99% on Leader-Follower
You scored higher than 99% on Unique-Ordinary
You scored higher than 99% on Offense-Defense
The expendable part was a bit of a blow, since he retired as of today.
Re: And Bob is:
Date: 2005-12-22 02:35 pm (UTC)I was wondering if he'd get knight, given that those are what he's most frightening with on the chessboard.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 01:43 am (UTC)Granted, you have two of them, but if you ever get a pawn to the last rank, surely you wouldn't turn it into a rook?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 01:54 am (UTC)As individuals the rooks are clearly inferior, it's as a pair that they're stronger. The standard point value for pieces (http://chess.about.com/od/beginners/ss/ble23pvl.htm) reflects that--the queen is worth 9 while a pair of rooks is worth 10. So while I'd always promote to a queen, I'd rather lose my queen than both rooks.
This may also reflect the level I play at--lots of beginner/occasional players overvalue queens, so I can force them to make bad moves by threatening her.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 04:19 pm (UTC)I'll have to keep that in mind the next time I play.