Danger: Elephants
Oct. 9th, 2006 10:21 amRhinos? Damn.
The article concentrates on the psychological damage to elephants from having their family networks destroyed, especially when children see their parents killed. The effects parallel what's been seen happening to human kids in the same region. Makes sense--social animals don't function well when violently isolated. Made me think of some of the things that've happened in this country. There's people working on repairing the damage, but there's no easy fixes. And the central problem for the elephants is the need for lots of land to roam in, which humans want too.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-09 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 11:23 am (UTC)Oh, have they been raping rhinoceroses too? What the fuck is that? I had no idea animals went in for bestiality and especially not big ponderous grey things. Are they even biologically related species?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 02:51 pm (UTC)As for your original question . . . I think it's just that they can't find any available elephants, hippos are too slippery, and everything else other than rhinos goes squish under them.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-10 10:03 pm (UTC)Wonder how the progress on deciphering elephant language is coming along.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 07:42 pm (UTC)Seems they've figured out that we and they are all just "people", even if we look a lot different...and they figured it out LONG before we did.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 08:37 am (UTC)I'm right with you on the an-socialization process, but I think what hte humans want isn't so much land (pace the Georgeists :-) as connection. Preferably to a mom and dad who look out after them.
The greatest predictor of youth violence is criminal parent(s). The greatest predictor of youth success is a committed, competent parent.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-14 12:56 am (UTC)I'd wondered what you were getting at--! (But because you're so generally sensible, assumed of course, that you were heading in that direction... and I'd missed the track!)