Nanofactory Critique
Sep. 14th, 2004 01:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
selenite0Chris Phoenix of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology wrote a detailed description of a nanofactory using an array of molecular assemblers to produce macro-scale products.
I think the basic design can be made to work, but it's going to need a lot of support infrastructure, and it still won't be able to do the high-speed duplication and bootstrapping the paper describes. Phoenix refers to this capability to justify his opinion that a nanotechnology breakthrough could rapidly transform the world. I dispute that.
An informal write-up of my take on the design paper is on our website (with supporting calculations here). This post is open to comments on my paper or the original nanofactory paper. Non-LJ users, please use the anonymous commenting feature and sign your name or handle.
[Discussion in comments and in this post.]
I think the basic design can be made to work, but it's going to need a lot of support infrastructure, and it still won't be able to do the high-speed duplication and bootstrapping the paper describes. Phoenix refers to this capability to justify his opinion that a nanotechnology breakthrough could rapidly transform the world. I dispute that.
An informal write-up of my take on the design paper is on our website (with supporting calculations here). This post is open to comments on my paper or the original nanofactory paper. Non-LJ users, please use the anonymous commenting feature and sign your name or handle.
[Discussion in comments and in this post.]
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 06:14 am (UTC)But damn, you're sexy.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 10:07 am (UTC)Glad you like it. ;-)