selenite0: (shiny)
[personal profile] selenite0
You, too, could get paid for writing Harry Potter fanfic:

http://www.strategypage.com/humor/articles/military_jokes_20052815.asp

Date: 2005-02-17 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patgund.livejournal.com
Rowling needs to lighten up. This is a parody, much like Mad Magazine. Yes, it's done to teach, but it doesn't change the fact it's a parody.

Date: 2005-02-18 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfrick.livejournal.com
That's debatable.

M-W.com defines "parody" as:

1 : a literary or musical work in which the style of an author or work is closely imitated for comic effect or in ridicule
2 : a feeble or ridiculous imitation


I think Rowling's solicitors will argue that there is a commercial purpose (namely, a training document) that makes thinly-disguised use of her characters.

I'm not saying I think she should win, but I wouldn't be surprised if she did. After all, what the Gubmint is doing is stealing her characters' popularity and using it for their own purposes, to no benefit to the author.
When I say commercial purposes, I don't mean they're selling this work for cash. I mean, it's a document they would have had to pay some author to invent in-whole, if it wasn't derivative of an existing work.

Damn, I'm glad I'm not a lawyer, and that I don't play one on tv.

~Rick

Date: 2005-02-18 04:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selenite.livejournal.com
I think the Army can make a good case for feeble and ridiculous.

Profile

selenite0: (Default)
selenite0

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 14th, 2026 05:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios